sidebar { width: 226px; float: right; } > /* Bottom layout */

Liberal TreeHugger

I am a conservative but unlike the current breed of "conservatives" I do not believe that the Republican Party is conservative. The current administration is hell bent on spending money taking away rights and playing a shell game with our taxes. I am starting this post to be a direct assault on the radical conservative movement that seeks to distort the record, lie and dupe the American voters into believing they care, are right, and are conservative.

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Okay We're back!

I saw a little interesting bit of trivia lately
O'Reilly believes Bill Clinton's presidency was a success.
Bill Clinton was "Brilliant. I think he did a good job as president," O'Reilly said. "Had a little problem with the honesty deal. And that gave me pause. But his presidency was successful."

So COME ON you hold-outs. Admit it. If Bill O'Reilly can admit it then you can too. Stew I'm not saying that you are wrong but well, you are soooo not right er, correct.

3 Comments:

At 9:44 PM, Blogger Stew Magoo said...

Depends on your stance.

Clinton did a terrible job of managing the budding terrorist outfits, gave technology to China, lied under oath, demolished the military... etc.

If you and Bill are happy about that, bully for ya.

He did do a good job of Lazziez Faire with regard to business. Of course, that created Enron.

You go on and be happy about his Presidency.

 
At 9:46 PM, Blogger Stew Magoo said...

Sorry, Laissez-faire.

 
At 9:23 PM, Blogger Mistake Master said...

funny how Rumsfeld is fighting the "war on TERROR!!!" with Clinton's military and according to him they don't need anything. Seems like you can't have it both way's really. Clinton either demolished the military or we have the "best fighting force known to man". So which is it?
Managing budding terrorist outfits is a presidential responisbility? Is that why under Bush's plan in Iraq we have more terrorists than ever before? So Clinton didn't create enough terrorists. That seems like it should go in the "pro" category.
Gave technology to China? What president has not made trade agreements? China would have just reverse-engineered it anyway. So what you are really mad about is his lying under oath.
About a blow job.
You have never lied about a blow job?

JESUS (not bobblehead)said

"let he who is without sin cast the first stone", and, "be careful that when you tell your brother he has a splinter in his eye that you first remove the beam from your own"
At worst it was an attemot to avoid Hillary's wrath. Can you blame him when you put it into that perspective?
Bush lies all the time,he's just careful to not be under oath. The RAPEublican majority has ensured that he isn't ever under oath. So it isn't really a moral victory now is it?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home